suzannakmathews's posterous

Call for Business/Communications Majors Needing Internship Experience

Company: The Date Maven

WANTED: Passionate Marketing & PR Superstar To Help Spread Love In The Midwest

Are you a social butterfly? Do you have a kind heart, killer smile, and a brilliant marketing mind? When it comes to motivation and self-sufficiency, are you your own best butt-kicker? Then you may have stumbled upon the internship opportunity of a lifetime. Here’s why.

We’re a growing company providing dating coaching and matchmaking services to single clients throughout the plains states and we’re looking for a ambitious, media-savvy, client-centered right-hand-man (or woman) to add to the team.

If you’ve ever wondered what it would be like to be a part of the dating industry or if you’ve ever wanted to improve the way people date and mate, you just might be our “match!”

Warning: We don’t suffer fools gladly. If you’re just looking for any old job or a little extra cash, this isn’t right for you (no personal drama, lazy people or texting addicts, please).

If you want to be a part of an innovative, entrepreneurial environment that will bring out your best, you may be exactly who we’re looking for. Send us your resume and tell us who you are and why you’re Mr. or Ms. Right! Remember to “woo” us a little and sprinkle a few metaphorical rose petals into the effort; Charm, creativity, and charisma are smiled upon. We’ll be reaching out to ideal candidates immediately.

Job Title: Marketing & Public Relations Assistant (Intern)

Duties:
1. Assist in marketing and promoting special events via traditional and social media
2. Write and/or proof-read press releases
3. Create and distribute invitations, posters, flyers, and other marketing collateral
4. Proof-read and edit blog posts, advice columns, essays, and other editorial content
5. Photograph special events
6. Assist in coordinating supplies, décor, food/drink, schedule, vendors, presenters, etc. for special events
7. Assist in creating new content for website, including video and text-based content
8. Attend necessary meetings and mixers as a substitute for the DM. These may include: Wichita Professional Communicators, Wichita Independent Business Association, Wichita Marketing Association, etc.
9. Proof-read Power Point presentations and assist with public speaking engagements
10. Assist in developing educational programs and cross-promotional events with area businesses
11. Recruit single women for matching database and single men as contracting clients
12. (Optional) Graphic Design assignments may be available for the interested and able candidate

Skills required:
1. Ability to work on a computer using Microsoft Office programs
2. Telephone & text messaging skills
3. Ability to use social media tools such as Facebook, Twitter, LinkdIn, etc.
4. Ability to organize information and multi-task
5. Ability to project a positive, confident image in both appearance and manner. Good grooming and professional dress are critical.
6. Outgoing personality and perceptivity; ability to interact with new people in social situations and “read” nonverbal behaviors
7. Creativity; Ability to brainstorm and problem-solve
8. Research skills; Ceaseless desire to learn and grow
9. Sales skills
10. Flexibility and open-mindedness; Ability to work in a non-corporate environment with an individual who is both dramatic and entrepreneurial

Hours:
5-10 Hours a week
The candidate will have the ability to set his/her own schedule around his or her class and work schedule with occasional evening or weekend hours expected.

Compensation:
College credit is available. 

Send inquiries and applications to suzanna@thedatemaven.com

Suzanna Mathews
www.suzannamathews.com
Twitter: @AWESuz

Social Strategies: The Flaw-O-Matic and The Tyranny of Choice

The Lonely American: Drifting Apart in the Twenty-First Century 
By Dr. Jacqueline Olds & Dr. Richard Schwarz
Excerpt from Chapter 6: The Technology of Relationships 

Technology changes our physical experiences of other people. It changes how we think about our relationships. It also changes our social strategies. Here are two intriguing bits of information: customers of online dating services go out with less than 1% of people whose profiles they study, while participants of speed-dating events go out with more than one in ten of the people they meet. Maybe speed daters are just more desirable than online daters. Speed-dating certainly takes more nerve, which might pull in better-looking players, but science writer John Tierney offers another hypothesis based on his wonderful concept of the Flaw-O-Matic, a "mechanism in the brain that instantly finds fault with a potential mate." Online dating kicks the Flaw-O-Matic into high gear: "They can spend all day finding minute faults in hundreds of potential partners." The speed-dating situation creates a different effect: "The people at these events realize that there aren't an infinite number of possibilities. If they want to get anything out of the evening, they have to settle for less than perfection. They also can't help noticing that they have competition, and that their ideal partner just might prefer someone else." 

We think Tierney is right on the mark. As "loneliness experts," we are very clear about the fact that online dating has been a boon to some of our loneliest patients. A colleague of ours nearly overflowed with her enthusiasm for it. "I have three patients in my practice who are married and one more with a live-in lover from online dating. And they'd tried everything else first -- Lunch Dates, that woman who charges so much for fiing people up, everything!" Online dating offers an increasingly important service in our socially fragmented world. But as Tierney points out, it also changes how we think about people. The power of the Internet as a social universe is in its seemingly limitless possibilities. The trap of the Internet as a social universe is also in its seemingly limitless possibilities. With limitless possibilities, why settle for any one of them? Something better might be just around the corner. We have a few friends who, likable as they are, share an irritating trait. whenever we plan to get together, they never commit themselves until the last minute, even when the plan was their idea. We finally admitted to ourselves what was going on up to that last minute. They were cruising for a better deal. Something better might still turn up and they didn't want to be tied down. The Internet shifts cruising for a better deal into overdrive. 

To read my commentary on Olds' and Schwarz's observations (coming soon!), visit my professional blog at www.thedatemaven.com

Snarky Malarky

I recently finished reading David Denby's book Snark: It's Mean, It's Personal, and It's Ruining Our Conversation. It should probably be required reading for every blogger, journalist, and political pundit. If you write a column or have your own tv show and you comment on public affairs, buy a copy and pass it around the office. Note that professors of communication may want to read it as well.

So here's what I learned, and here's what the book has me thinking about: Denby defines snark as "a teasing, rug-pulling form of insult that attempts to steal someone's mojo, erase her cool, annihilate her effectiveness, and it appeals to a knowing audience that shares the contempt of the snarker and therefore understands whatever references he makes . . . It's parasitic, referential, insinuating . . . It refuses true political engagement, the job of getting at the truth of things . . . Snark often functions as an enforcer of mediocrity and conformity. In its cozy knowingness, snark flatters you by assuming that you get the contemptuous joke." Undoubtedly, as you finish reading that description, so many names will flood your mind (TMZSaturday Night Live, The OnionGlenn Beck...) Sometimes snarkers are satirist and sometimes they are just egomaniacal, blow-hard, squawk boxes. Whether the snark is funny, truth-telling, or obnoxious and annoying is a matter of perspective, I suppose. But Denby does manage to delineate between snark-as-entertainment, snark-as-gadfly, and snark-as-giant-jack*** (and for that explication, you'll have to read the book yourself.)

I confess, I actually enjoy other people's snark when I know the snarker, have a broader sense of their aptitude for humor and cultural criticism, and the audience is relatively limited -- Such as when a lunch date or party hostess cleverly ridicules someone in the public eye but is sufficiently self-deprecating to not come across as a bitter little biotch...) But I don't really enjoy it when it's packaged as a mass comm product. Denby's right when he says that "in a media society, snark is an easy way of seeming smart." Snarkers do it to impress and gain social currency with other snarkers. 

If this describes you -- either because you are a source of snark or you have an unquenchable lust for snark -- I suppose you don't have to feel too awful, because human malice is as natural and predictable as human kindness. And, Denby points out, "savage insult, especially insult directed at the powerful, is a necessary part of democratic culture."

But after reading Denby's book, I'm ready to think about the way snark pervades our culture in more theological or pseudo-spiritual terms. Denby's observation that "Privacy doesn't matter much as a spiritual value and a sanctified space anymore" rings a steely shade of true in our celebrity-obsessed, 60-minute/24-hour-news-cycle, social networked culture. And that's a blanket statement about any generation younger than my own, though as a 30-somethingish person who was in college when MTV debuted The Real World, I'm probably kind of on the cusp. Privacy as a spiritual value -- wow, anyone want to take that on as a master's thesis? (An interdisciplinary one, no less, for anyone reading this who might be earning degrees in communication and/or psychology and/or sociology and/or religion!)

While this brings me to a conclusion that's really more of a loose end (and is therefore unlikely to be satisfying -- sorry!), I need to marinate a bit more with my own theme and perhaps even develop a sermon out of this. Stay posted. 

In Schools, cursive loses to computers

By Tom Breen, Associated Press
Published in The Wichita Eagle 8/20/09

Charleston resident Kelli Davis was in for a surprise when her 8th grade daughter brought home some routine paperwork at the start of school this fall. Davis signed the form and then handed it to her daughter for a signature. 
"I just assumed she knew how to do it, but I have a piece of paper with her signature on it, and it looks like a little kid's signature," Davis said.
Her daughter explained that she hadn't been required to make the graceful loops and joined letters of cursive writing in years. That prompted a call to the school and another surprise.
West Virginia's largest school system teaches cursive, but only in the 3rd grade.
"It doesn't get quite the emphasis it did years ago, primarily because of all the technology skills we now teach," said Jane Roberts, assistant superintendent for elementary education in Kanawha County schools.
Davis' experience gets repeated every time parents, who recall their own hours of laborious cursive practice, learn that what used to be called "penmanship" is being shunted aside at schools across the country in favor of 21st century skills.
The decline of cursive is happening as students are doing more and more work on computers, including writing. In 2011, the writing test of the National Assessment of Educational Progress will require 8th and 11th graders to compose on computers.
"We need to make sure they'll be ready for what's going to happen in 2020 or 2030," said Katie Van Sluys, a professor at DePaul University and the president of the Whole Language Umbrella, a conference of the National Council of Teachers of English.
Handwriting is increasingly something people do only when they need to make a note to themselves rather than communicate with others, she said. Students accustomed to using computers to write at home have a hard time seeing the relevance of hours of practicing cursive handwriting. 
Text messaging, e-mail, and word processing have replaced handwriting outside the classroom, said Cheryl Jeffers, a professor at Marshall University's College of Education and Human Services, and she worries they'll replace it entirely before long. 
"I am not sure students have a sense of any reason why they should vest their time and effort in writing a message out manually when it can be sent electronically in seconds."
At Mountaineer Montessori in Charleston, teacher Sharon Spencer stresses cursive to her 1st and 3rd graders.
To Spencer, cursive writing is an art that helps teach them muscle control and hand-eye coordination.
"In the age of computers, I just tell the children, what if we are on an island and don't have electricity? One of the ways we communicate is through writing," she said.

My response: While I'm pro-technology, I'm also pro-fundamentals -- and I believe cursive handwriting is one of them. The argument is being made that no one actually CHOOSES to write something by hand when it can more easily and quickly be written electronically. Yet I don't think math teachers would accept a similar argument -- that because we have calculators do perform mathematical functions for us, we needn't learn how to add, subtract, multiply, and divide manually. So, why is this a convincing argument (to some) for the phasing-out of handwriting?
Are teachers and administrators giving such fleeting attention to handwriting skills because of No Child Left Behind? If not that, then how do education leaders come to the decision to practically exclude cursive handwriting from the curriculum? 
During a job interview earlier this fall, a prospective employer told me how disgusted he was that supposedly college-educated candidates had such poor spelling and grammar skills. He blamed their reliance on word processing programs that corrected their mistakes for them. 
Clearly, children are being done a disservice if handwriting (cursive) skills are being under-emphasized in school. I hope the issue will get more attention and discussion because of this article.

It's against the rules to retweet your tweets

By Bridget Carey
McClatchy Newspapers

I sometimes hear folks talk about how they like to re-post a tweet from the morning again in the afternoon, just in case someone missed the message before. Don't do that. It's against Twitter's terms of service, and they consider it spam. If you're scanning Twitter's terms, you might miss it, because it's just a quick bullet point on how you can get crosswise with your tweets:
"If you post duplicate content over multiple accounts or multiple duplicate updates on one account."
Twitter reached out to the SocialOomph service this week to remind them that repeated tweets are against the rules -- they add to he clutter and won't be tolerated. If you haven't heard of SocialOomph before, it's a tool that lets you set your tweets to be sent at specific times, track keywords, or use other tools -- like auto direct messages. One of those services was to auto repeat your earlier tweet. Here's what Twitter said to SocialOomph, according to Social Oomph's blog:
"Recurring Tweets are a violation no matter how they are done, including whether or not someone pays you to have a special privilege We don't want to see any duplicate tweets whatsoever. They pollute Twitter, and tools shouldn't be gin o enable people to break the rules."
Social Oomph is taking off the feature.

My response: I appreciate that Twitter stood up to S.O. on this issue; this creates the impression that they are user-centered. But, I wasn't part of the problem anyway. It had never occurred to me to repost my Tweets. I don't presume that what I'm tweeting is so utterly compelling and fascinating that the messages merit that level of insistence. And again, I do think Twitter users will be relieved that this policy is being enforced. 

Vatican symposium explores use of media for message

By Nicole Winfield
Associated Press

Vatican officials and Catholic bishops are getting a lesson on the Internet from Facebook, Wikipedia and Google executives as the church struggles to get its message out in the digital age. A four-day symposium in the Vatican . . . [addressed] Internet copyright issues and hacking -- including testimony from a young Swiss hacker and an Interpol cybercrime official. The meeting is being hosted by the European bishop's media commission and is designed to delve into questions about what Internet culture means for the church's mission and how the church communicates that mission to others. Pope Benedict XVI has tried to bring the Vatican into the Internet age and launched a YouTube channel earlier this year. Officials say he also emails and surfs the Web. But the Vatican's online shortcomings have been woefully apparent. Earlier this year, Benedict made clear he was disappointed that Vatican officials hadn't done a simple Internet search to discover the Holocaust-denying comments of a bishop before the pontiff lifted his excommunication.

My response: I'm not Catholic, so I may lack the religious indoctrination necessary to see potential applications for these media within this belief system. My initial response, however, was that the Catholic church seems so "Old World" in some respects (policies, practices, matters of doctrine) yet seems to be yearning for modernization in other respects. I suppose church leaders could send out generic tweets to parishoners like "Don't sin," "Be good," and "Say you're sorry." (I'm being cheeky here...) Or, maybe parishoners could Tweet their prayer requests to their priest. Come to think of it, all of us could probably use a little encouragement like that -- and the immediacy of the medium is appealing. I'll stay tuned to see what develops.

Retailers use social media to sell, listen

By Doris Hajewski, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Published in The Wichita Eagle, Sunday November 8, 2009

Kohl's online customers would like to get free shipping on all their purchases. And the right people at Kohl's know it. That's because free shipping is a constant request from some of the retailer's 720,000-plus fans on Facebook. In the 6 months since Kohl's Corp. made its debut on Facebook, the department store chain has amassed one of the largest fan bases among retailers, with 720,000-plus fans, and is part of a trend that has more and more consumer businesses using free social media Web sites. 
"Social media is becoming the way you connect with your customer," said Bill Emerson, a former retail executive who heads Emerson Advisors in West Palm Beach, Fla. "Big retailers are getting on to this." 
A new poll conducted by Bigresearch for Shop.org, a retail trade group, found that 47% of online retailers will increase their use of social media during the coming holiday season. More than half, 60%, said they had added or improved their Facebook page and Twitter pages this year. Menomonee Falls, Wis.,-based Kohl's ranks third among retailers in the number of fans on Facebook, after Starbucks, with 4.6 million fans, and Best Buy, with about 843,000.
"Kohl's Facebook page gives our customers a place to interact, share stories and celebrate Kohl's great values and savings tools," said Vickie Shamion, vice president for public relations at Kohl's. For the holiday season, Kohl's will change the look of its Facebook page to match its ad campaign. In addition, the company will place merchandise giveaways on popular consumer blogs. 

My response: While I'm not very likely to write a letter to a company about any shopping complaints I might have -- nor am I likely to stand in line at the customer service counter in a store with that complaint -- I might consider expressing it via a company's website or Facebook page, so the use of social media to gather and respond to customer concerns seems like a smart idea. 
Yet, I'm not necessarily eager to interact with a company in this way when my business transaction with it is status quo. It seems like every time I shop at Kohl's (and a number of other stores) the clerk checking me out hands me a receipt and tells me to visit the website to take a survey within a specified period of time. Not once have I ever followed through on this, probably because I didn't have a strong opinion to share and I didn't feel it worth my time. (I need strong incentives to participate in online surveys.)
As to whether FB or other social networking platforms are going to influence my buying during the holidays... That's rather UNlikely. I may be in the minority here, but I'm more likely to fold up the advertising circular from the Sunday paper and stuff it in my purse so I have a constant reminder as I go about my daily routine that I want to check out a certain something at a certain store. As soon as I'm off FB, I typically forget most of what I just read and did on FB. So, the hard-copy of the ad circular is a little more "present" for me.
Finally, I was a little surprised to learn that Kohl's has a larger FB following than Target, Macy's, and Nordstrom. I don't have anything against Kohl's, I just think that the other stores have a little more cache and better defined branding. 

Communication Week: Day Two, Session Four

Of the four panelists who appeared in this section of the program, I was most interested to hear from Carrie Follis, Editor-In-Chief of Naked City magazine. I am a regular reader and was curious to see and hear from the head of this publication in person. Follis described her editorial style as “loose” and her publication as “a hothouse for up-and-coming talent” who create  “fearless content with an edge.” Some of the distinguishing features of the magazine include its unusual size, the uncoated stock paper that gives it a softer, less mainstream feel, and readers who respond to the content with outspoken feedback. Her advocacy is to show Wichita as being cool, hip, cultural, and quirky. Although I was slightly put off by spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors I noticed when I was a new reader, I now understand that error-free writing is not Follis’ main concern and I’ve adapted my expectations.

Nicole Howerton, designer of GoPlayKansas, shared her journey with this non-profit to raise awareness and usage of Wichita’s parks and public recreational spaces. It’s unfortunate that neither mainstream nor alternative media in Wichita seem to have taken notice and covered her efforts yet (unless I’ve simply missed it.)

Barry Owens, publisher of the College Hill Commoner and the Downtowner, seems to have his work cut out for him as an independent newspaperman in this era of dying mainstream papers and consumer-preferred online content. His sense of identify and mission, however, are very clear and are likely the key ingredient to his success (or at least survival) and that is that he provides a sense of place and a unifier for people and business of a certain geographic location. The Wichita Eagle is showing some signs of understanding this ideal and of moving toward it, but has also made some decisions this year that have greatly undermined and diminished the sense of place that had long ago been established.

The final speaker was Rebecca Zepick, creator of stateofthestateks.com. As a former campaign communications director for several politicians, Zepick seemed well-suited to her new role as political reporter. Her website operates on a membership business model (viewers must subscribe to join) and each week she selects one policy issue to focus on. She strives to keep the content local and one of the draws is the immediacy of her content. She explained that she tries to have an advocate for and against each issue but that because people are often reluctant to take such a clearly identified or polarized position on controversial issues, she simply features their positions without labeling or categorizing them. I think this should provide us a collective cue for the direction civil discourse should be moving; however, with the popularity of FOX News and other passionately positioned news outlets, it doesn’t seem likely.

Communication Week: Day Two, Session Two

As a follow-up to the previous day’s presentation, executives from the area’s top ad agencies participated in a panel discussion about the future of their industry. Sullivan Higdon & Sink’s Sam Williams spoke first. He had read in an IBM paper stating that there will be more changes in the next five years than in the previous fifty for the advertising industry. We noted in a previous post that consumers are more empowered and self-reliant, but Williams outlined four specific scenarios:

1.      The traditional players in advertising will be squeezed.

2.      Ad exposure will be whim-driven. Consumers will only look at what they want to look at and when they want to look at it.

3.      Advertisers’ clients will demand more data to measure the results of their advertising efforts. If it isn’t measurable, they won’t buy it.

4.      More clients (businesses) are going directly to users (consumers) to produce the advertising itself. Increasingly, they are skipping the advertiser/middle man.

Williams offered some helpful advice for those seeking a job in advertising as well:

1.      Be collaborative. It’s important to be able to work with others.

2.      Be strategic. You need to be able to solve a problem from multiple points of view or tackle multiple angles. It helps to be curious!

3.      Be odd. OK, he probably doesn’t mean we should be odd in a creepy or anti-social way; what he means is we should look for new ways to do things. It’s another way of saying the SHS motto “We hate sheep.” You won’t get ahead by being a follower.

4.      Be passionate. If you’re going to succeed in the environment of all these upcoming changes, you’d better have a burning desire to be the best (fill in the blank – journalist, copy writer, graphic designer, whatever) you can be but also be well rounded enough that you understand and appreciate the people you’re working with and/or competing against who are being the best _____ they can be.

5.      Be critical. And be able to accept criticism. He balances this by stressing that it’s important to be able to take a joke as well; don’t take yourself too seriously.

6.      Be pure of heart. Be real. Be sincere. Be genuine. Be yourself. Focus your creativity on your product, not on creating a false persona.

Williams concluded by semi-paraphrasing John Stossel in saying that when you graduate from college, the job you end up in likely won’t exist.

Susan Armstrong from Armstrong-Shank followed Williams with her own “To Do” list for advertising:

1.      Differentiate between sending out messages and pulling people in. It’s more effective to invite them in to learn about a product and service than to just blast them with unexpected and unwanted messages telling them what to buy and do.

2.      Think more globally and be more culturally sensitive. If we haven’t gotten this point from our readings of Friedman, then we’re hopeless!

3.      Be more strategic. I’d like to know more about what she means by this. I know that it’s standard for an agency like hers to help a company establish strategic marketing plans to achieve its objectives, and I also know that a part of that involves overseeing and evaluating market research and adjusting strategy to meet the changes in the market and competitive conditions. I also don’t think it’s anything new to establish relationships with industry influencers and key community and strategic partners. Is she simply saying these activities are more important than ever? This may be where a later discussion about web analytics would come to bear…

4.      Non-adapters won’t be leading the way. With 10.8 billion Google searches done in one month in the U.S. (from some part of a population of 300 million citizens), she would like newcomers to the industry to be Google or Yahoo certified.

Of course, this certification didn’t exist when I was in college since neither search engine had been invented yet. But I can say without a doubt that at least I’m in possession of the other set of skills Armstrong says job-applicants should have:

 

1.      Have strong written communication skills.

2.      Have a diverse knowledge base.

3.      Know how to learn. Have broader critical and analytical thinking skills.

4.      Learn about negotiations and relationship management.

5.      Be flexible. Be able to adapt quickly.

6.      Be business advisors who specialize in advertising and public relations.

7.      Identify who the “thought leaders” are and follow them. (Presumably, she’s talking about the Thomas Friedmans, the Malcolm Gladwells and the Seth Godins of our culture…)

8.      Be digital experts.

The Greteman Group’s Deanna Harms rounded out the panel with a message that we had heard repeated several times over the course of two days: we’ve empowered consumers who know what they want and can find it, thus we are in a new era of transparency. This transparency goes for all: the business and it’s employees, the advertising agency and it’s employees, and YOU the consumer they want to reach. There is no longer an online persona and an offline persona; they are one in the same. There is only one YOU. This blending and uniting of online and offline selves has some implications that weren’t touched upon in this particular discussion but are interesting to think about… However, I won’t digress.

Harms explained that the Greteman Group no longer uses the terms “Public Relations” or “”Advertising” because everything they do is COMMUNICATION. Their activities are ultimately all about persuasion and everyone in her industry is looking for ways to provide value. Everyone is asking “Who are our customers?” and “What are their lives like?” and “When and how can we find them at the point of relevance – at the exact time they are looking for X?”

She also described the agency as being media neutral. In other words, they don’t favor a particular media but rather approach them strategically with the question “What are we trying to accomplish?” driving the buy.

These two distinctions regarding attitude and philosophy seem to equate to a broader, more holistic way of doing business. But how does an aspiring advertising executive get IN to the business?

Harms explained that every business is like a family. In the hiring process, show the hiring manager what you bring to the family. Convince them to adopt another child. At Greteman Group, they like people who are fun, energetic, enthusiastic, and who want to learn. It’s also important to read the daily paper so that you’ll know what’s going on in the local economy and the local business scene – especially as it impacts your clients. “There’s a lot bigger world than just your interests,” said Harms. After reading Friedman’s The World Is Flat and hearing from a series of distinguished communicators, don’t we know it!

13
To Posterous, Love Metalab